For an audio version of this post, please click on the speaker icon (top left).
In the beginning of my financial journey, I envisioned retiring around the age of 53.
The reason for this odd mile marker choice was that this would be my age when my daughter went off to college.
I figured if I retired earlier I would still be bound to my daughter’s school schedule.
If I couldn’t truly live my envisioned “retiree life” because of her schooling, I might as well be working.
Now that I have turned 48, I have entered that dreaded “5 year window” every pre-retiree eventually faces.
It is this window that the dreaded SORR (sequence of risk return) can wreak the most havoc on a portfolio and when your nest egg is at its most fragile state.
David Graham, of FI Physician does a wonderful series of articles addressing this dangerous period, highlighted by the helpful post, “De-risking Your Portfolio Prior To Retirement: Why And How.”
I also recently came across a video, “The Coming Retirement Crisis,” which also put me a bit on edge and was the inspiration for a previous post I wrote.
Everything I have read backed up the premise that as you approach retirement you should become more conservative in your asset allocation.
It truly is a premise I believe in.
So what is the big issue, you may ask?
Well knowing what you should do and doing it are two completely different things.
The asset allocation that I created for myself had done very well (boosted with a very kind and long bull run we have enjoyed for a decade).
It truly felt like I had a winning hand year after year.
The problem is there was a voice in the back of my head that kept urging me to hold onto this hand.
And therein lies the problem with classic financial behavioral psychology at play.
An asset becomes overweighted in your portfolio when it outperforms other classes that lag behind due to underperformance.
When you rebalance you are therefore selling the “winners” to buy the “losers (or alternatively you throw in new capital towards the losers.)
That is indeed a hard pill to swallow.
Every fabric of your being questions this move.
A part of you feels like you have caught lightening in a bottle so why on Earth would you open the cap and let it escape?
Are you doing the right thing?
And these emotions arise just when talking about the simple act of rebalancing a portfolio to your current desired asset allocation.
The feelings of doubt get magnified even more when you are talking about doing a major change to your portfolio that comes with transitioning to a more conservative allocation, as was in my case.
Not only was I faced with selling down my high performing equities component, but I was talking about permanently taking some chips off the table by reducing the overall percentage of equities in my Market portfolio.
It is hard to take equities off your plate when they have been doing so well both recently and throughout the history of the stock market.
Equities can be considered the engine driving the majority of gains enjoyed by a portfolio.
However riding that engine too hard and too long can cause it to overheat and blow up.
Equities can be considered the engine driving the majority of gains enjoyed by a portfolio. However riding that engine too hard and too long can cause it to overheat and blow up. Click To TweetThe last thing an individual wants is for that event to happen right before your planned retirement date.
Equities are far more volatile than most other asset classes.
Yes the overall trend for equities is upwards, but most about-to-retire individuals do not have the luxury to wait for a recovery.
So what did you end up doing Xrayvsn?
I wish I could say that it was an easy, slam-dunk decision that never made me second-guess it in the following weeks.
As I said, even knowing that it was the right thing to do did not make the decision easier.
It was sort of like having the devil on one shoulder and an angel on the other, both pleading their cases:
The Devil:
Come on.
Let’s let it ride for just a little longer.
How do you think you will feel if the market continues to go up and you already cashed out?
Won’t you feel like a fool?
The Angel:
You have been lucky for a long time, how much longer do you think this can last?
There are countless stories of unfortunate individuals who were just about to retire when the market fell and they had to delay their retirement, often by many years, because of it.
Don’t add your name to that list.
I even tried rationalizing a decision to maintain my current asset allocation because of the passive income machine I have generated from my real estate portfolio.
I thought that, worst case scenario, I still would have an income floor to rely on because of this passive income, trying to justify maintaining a higher than recommended equity allocation.
The Decision:
In the end, logic won out.
I could not argue against material presented by far smarter people than I about the value of de-risking one’s portfolio in the period right before planned retirement.
Once I came to this decision, albeit kicking and screaming along the way, it was just a matter of a few button clicks and voila, it was done.
Although, because of my reduced exposure to equities, I will not capture all of the highs that may occur as stocks continue to climb, I will have also blunted the lows should a recession indeed occur during my period of most vulnerability for SORR.
Note:
If you are in search of financial help, please consider enlisting the service of any of the sponsors of this blog who I feel are part of the “good guys and gals of finance.”
Even a steadfast DIY’er can sometimes gain benefit from the occasional professional input.
NOTE: The website XRAYVSN contains affiliate links and thus receives compensation whenever a purchase through these links is made (at no further cost to you). As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Although these proceeds help keep this site going they do not have any bearing on the reviews of any products I endorse which are from my own honest experiences. Thank you- XRAYVSN
Hey XRV,
Congrats on entering the home stretch to retirement. 5 years will go by fast. Emotions should not be involved with investing but I do think it would be bitter sweet to start letting go of the gas pedal. Thanks.
Thanks VP. Always appreciate you stopping by and commenting. Yeah I can’t believe that I anticipate retiring in 5 years if all goes well. Bittersweet is the perfect way to describe changing to a more conservative portfolio.
It makes it even harder that bonds currently have such crappy returns. I’m starting to move towards another break point where our asset allocation needs to slide a little less risky. I don’t market time normal investments or purchases, but I find myself truly fighting that urge with the asset shift. More on the bond side then stocks.
I agree. Prior to my recent shift I took an alternative approach and substitute REITs in for bonds because the yield was much higher. The gamble did pay off and it was especially hard getting rid of some of those REITs with my new allocation going to more bonds. Have to tell myself that giving up the highs in order to diminish the loss is the game at play now
Thanks for the shout out above! I’m really proud of that piece because there isn’t much out there on the de-risking glidepath.
Sounds like you didn’t do a 5 year glidepath, just made the changes all at once. Theoretically, it is probably the right thing to do since you know a nasty drop in the market would lock you in to Sequence Risk with less than 5 years to go!
I made the change all at once earlier this year as well, and haven’t regretted it (yet!).
The glide path would be less drastic but I figured that I was going to do the rip the bandaid off method when I finally wanted to start de-risking.
I hope to employ the glide path for increasing equities later in retirement.
Nice job. It’s a good time to become a bit more conservative. The economic outlook is pretty murky next year.
So what’s your asset allocation now?
I agree that conservative may be the best bet going forward as well. In terms of my “market portfolio” which is across both retirment and brokerage accounts I initially had it at 75% stock (55% domestic and 20% international), 20% alternative (REIT), 5% bond. It did extremely well for the past 5+ yrs with double digit returns often 15+%. I just changed it to 40% stock (33 domestic 7 international), 35% bonds, 17% alternative, and 8% gold. To compliment this I also have a real real estate portfolio component where I invest almost exclusively in multi family apartment complexes through… Read more »
I’m with you, friend.
30-50% stocks makes a lot of sense at our stage. You capture most of the growth with much less volatility.
I’m about 1/3 of each now: stocks, bonds, real estate.
It makes me feel good that other success stories like yourself have a similar allocation at similar stages. Volatility is a young man’s game
I agree that your old portfolio was way too risky as you get ready for retirement. I totally retired recently. My asset allocation is 63% equity (20% foreign), 4% cash equivalents (3-4 years worth of expenses), 33% bonds (munis in taxable and BND is tax protected). Reits in Roth (consider this equity). This portfolio returned 3.8% dividend and interest or $275k. This is more than I spend. I plan to keep the equity 60-65% for now. I think keeping more cash is making me feel comfortable with SORR.
Hey Hatton. Thanks for stopping by. Didn’t realize that you fully retired (last I recall you were part time after leaving your private practice).
$275k in dividend is incredible and would me way more than enough for me too.
I will build a cash bucket prior to pulling the plug myself. With this low interest rate that is probably going to be the most painful part because of cash drag